繁體
  • 简体中文
  • 繁體中文

熱門資訊> 正文

Less-Splendid Housing Bubbles And Crushed Markets In America, September Update

2019-09-26 18:16

Just how much housing market dynamics differ from market to market is depicted by the 20-city CoreLogic Case-Shiller Home Price Index.

I divide these 20 markets into two parts.

The first is the most splendid housing bubbles in America, where home prices have more than doubled since January 2000, and in some cases nearly tripled.

The second part comprises the remaining markets where prices have not yet doubled since January 2000, including markets that had been totally crushed and, while up in percentage terms, remain relatively low.

Price gains down to trickle in Chicago. Red-hot Dallas slows. Charlotte and Minneapolis surge. Crushed Detroit and Cleveland hit new highs.

Housing market dynamics are local. Just how much they differ from market to market is depicted by the 20-city CoreLogic Case-Shiller Home Price Index. I divide these 20 markets into two parts: The most splendid housing bubbles in America, where home prices have more than doubled since January 2000, and in some cases nearly tripled; and the remaining markets where prices have not yet doubled since January 2000, including markets that had been totally crushed and, while up in percentage terms, remain relatively low.

In the Chicago metro, prices of single-family houses rose 0.4% in July from June, and were up 1.6% from July last year, according to the CoreLogic Case-Shiller Home Price Index for Chicago, which is comprised of the counties of Cook (includes the City of Chicago), DeKalb, Du Page, Grundy, Kane, Kendal, McHenry, and Will. The index remained down 13% from the crazy peak during Housing Bubble 1:

The Case-Shiller Index was set at 100 for January 2000. Chicago's peak index value of 169 during Housing Bubble 1 indicates that house prices had risen 69% between January 2000 and September 2006.

Condo prices in the Chicago metro declined a tad in July from June, after having been flat in the prior month. This further whittled down the year-over-year gain to just 0.7%:

The charts here are on the same scale, with the vertical axis going from 100 to 180. This makes price moves easier to compare from market to market. The exceptions are Dallas and Detroit: Dallas because the house price boom since 2012 has overshot 180 by a wide margin; and Detroit because the plunge during Housing Bust 1, from already low levels, has pushed the index far below 100.

The Dallas-Fort Worth metro - the counties of Collin, Dallas, Delta, Denton, Ellis, Hunt, Johnson, Kaufman, Parker, Rockwall, Tarrant, and Wise - managed to miss the full beauty of Housing Bubble 1, and so, also missed the full beauty of Housing Bust 1. But since January 2012, house prices have skyrocketed by 71%!

Over the past 12 months, the pace of the increases has slowed. In July, the index ticked up 0.2% from June and was up 2.7% over the past 12 months. This compares to 12-month price increases in the 5-10%+ range between 2013 and 2018:

House prices in the Minneapolis metro rose 0.7% in July from June, and were up 4.2% year over year. Note how Minneapolis and Chicago ran in parallel through Housing Bubble 1 and Housing Bust 1 but have diverged afterwards: Prices in Minneapolis are 5.5% above the peak of Housing Bubble 1; prices in Chicago are 13% below the peak:

In the Charlotte metro, house prices rose 0.3% in July from June and were up 4.6% year over year, continuing a relentless price boom that started in early 2012:

House prices in the Atlanta metro barely budged in July (+0.09%) compared to June. This reduced the year-over-year gain to 4.0%. While still a large, it was the smallest such gain since September 2012, when Atlanta emerged from Housing Bust 1.

In the Atlanta metro, house prices plunged 40% during Housing Bust 1, with the Case-Shiller index hitting a value of 82.5 by early 2012, a value first seen in 1996. Note the larger amount of white space compared to the above charts, which are on the same scale (except Dallas):

House prices in the Detroit metro ticked up 0.2% in July from June and are up 4.1% year over year, hitting an all-time record for the third month in a row, now 1.7% above the old high set in December 2005. The Detroit metro is comprised of the counties of Lapeer, Livingston, Macomb, Oakland, Saint Clair, and Wayne (includes the City of Detroit).

During Housing Bust 1, this housing market collapsed from already low-ish levels to levels first seen in 1992, which included a total collapse of the housing market in the City of Detroit. To show how far prices plunged and to what extent they have soared since then, I have extended the scale to where it starts at 60 instead of 100 (value in January 2000), marked by the shaded area. The index has doubled in less than eight years since hitting bottom:

House prices in the Cleveland metro rose 1.1% in July from June and were up 3.2% year over year, setting a new record for the third month in a row, now up 3.2% from the old record set during Housing Bubble 1 in 2006. Since January 2000, the Case-Shiller Index for Detroit has risen 27%, which was, in our era of housing bubbles and bust, the smallest such increase among the 20 metros covered by the Case-Shiller Index:

By comparison, the record biggest and fastest price increases among the 20 metros in the Case-Shiller Index is held by the Miami metro, where prices in the span of six years - between January 2000 and December 2006 - skyrocketed by 193% before collapsing. The record for price increases between January 2000 and July 2019 is held by the Los Angeles metro, where prices over the 19-year period increased by 186%

Seattle house prices fell year over year for the third month in a row. New York condo prices have been flat for 24 months. San Francisco Bay Area prices have been flat for 12 months despite all the startup millionaires. Los Angeles barely ticked up from a year ago. Other metros had larger gains. Read... "The Most Splendid Housing Bubbles in America, Sep. Update."

Original Post

Editor's Note:

The summary bullets for this article were chosen by Seeking Alpha editors.

風險及免責提示:以上內容僅代表作者的個人立場和觀點,不代表華盛的任何立場,華盛亦無法證實上述內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。投資者在做出任何投資決定前,應結合自身情況,考慮投資產品的風險。必要時,請諮詢專業投資顧問的意見。華盛不提供任何投資建議,對此亦不做任何承諾和保證。